Housing

Major housing measure set for S.F.'s November ballot



The San Francisco Board of Supervisors took on two of the city's most intractable problems in its first meeting of the year - and handed victories to a plan to set aside an unprecedented sum of money to finance affordable housing and a measure to streamline enforcement of laws against sleeping in the parks.
Related stories:

Just Cause campaigns to increase affordable housing funds

%alt The City of Oakland is currently considering its billion-dollar budget, including significant resources for meeting critical needs in Oakland for working families. Two specific funding sources include a $1.9 million surplus that was unaccounted for in earlier budget proposals, as well as another $25 million in the General Purpose Reserve. Just Cause Oakland is making specific demands of that surplus to go towards fighting gentrification and the loss of African-Americans from the city, in response to the city’s loss of between 13 and 25% of its African-American population since 2000 – largely due to housing issues.

To focus on this issue, Just Cause held a rally on the steps of City Hall on June 14th, before presenting their case in front of City Council at the hearing scheduled to debate the upcoming budget. Just Cause has developed a menu of several Emergency Housing Service programs that it wants the city to fund with $5.68 million from the budget. These services would help to keep low-income renters and homeowners from losing their homes and potentially leaving Oakland. For more information about this campaign, contact Magdalene Martinez at 510-763-5877or Vanessa Moses at 510-435-0500.

Combating Gentrification Through Equitable Development


The Fifth Avenue Committee (FAC) has worked for fifteen years to revitalize the lower Park Slope neighborhood of Brooklyn, building affordable housing, rehabbing dilapidated buildings and training residents to own cooperative businesses in the neighborhood. The success of these efforts has forced them into unanticipated arenas, including a Displacement Free Zone campaign—their fierce effort to defend tenants within the 36-block neighborhood from evictions; and a local and state policy campaign with other New York City organizations to give landlords incentives to keep their tenants in place and to require developers to include affordable housing in market-rate developments.

Stop Condo Conversion Initiative

%alt
Since 1981, Oakland's condo conversion laws have protected renters from landlords who seek to convert their apartment buildings into market rate condos.  Three Oakland City Councilmembers, led by Ignacio De La Fuente, are seeking to undo the legal protections before Mayor Dellums takes office.  Utilizing the misleading title of the "Affordable Homeownership Initiative" their proposal seeks to create an extreme cap of 800 to 1,500 units a year with programs that, according to City staff, benefit only the top 10% of Oakland renters.  If this policy passes, rent control protections will disappear once the unit converts and is sold.  Oakland&'s affordable housing crisis will be exacerbated, as well as increasing community problems of declining public school enrollment.  In addition, in order to accommodate Oakland&'s workforce development needs, more rental housing must be developed, rather than passing policies that convert scarce affordable rental housing into market-rate condos.  Key housing rights organizations and ally groups are working to defeat the proposed policy including ACORN, EBHO, East Bay Community Law Center, the Green Party, Oakland Tenants Union, and SEIU 790.

State & Local Legislation

State Legislation

Proposition 90 Campaign: It's a Taxpayer Trap!
This November, Californians will vote on one of the most significant measures affecting local governments’ ability to implement progressive legislation to reach the ballot in years. Backers of this initiative want voters to believe that its focus is to "reform eminent domain" but that is just the bait in the trap. Its real goal is to prevent local governments from passing new laws. It would require payment for any new land-use laws adopted throughout the state. This would effectively make it impossible to do any of the following: protect air and water quality; require community benefits from developers; implement any kind of zoning in local neighborhoods; or even pass consumer protection laws.

Meanwhile, after passage of a similar measure in Oregon--a much smaller state--2,000 claims have been filed totaling more than four billion dollars. This figure doesn’t even include the costs to state and local governments to administer the claims. Who pays? Taxpayers. To read more about the coordinated attempt to dismantle environmental and land use protections throughout the American West, visit: http://www.hcn.org/servlets/hcn.Article?article_id=16409.

To get involved in the campaign to stop Prop 90, visit www.noprop90.com

California Infrastructure Bonds 2006

Urban Habitat Opposes Proposition 1B and Supports Prop 1C

Summary

Urban Habitat’s analysis finds that Proposition 1B (transportation) will put California on a path to more sprawl, increased pollution, and less opportunities for our state’s low-income communities of color while Proposition 1C (housing) provides our state with smart opportunities for economic prosperity and growth, promotes better communities and strengthens equity for all citizens.  View Full Report (PDF, 137k)

Fixin' to Stay (Summer 2002)

 

Anti-Displacement Policy Options & Community Response (Vol.9, No.1)

Fixin' to Stay cover imageGentrification, the wrenching process of neighborhood change, was first named in the 1960s.  The name, however did not acknowledge the permanent erasure that takes place when a community loses its memory.  Gentrification, or urban blight were policy terms that carried social and racial values, as well as a political and economic agenda.  The layered meanings of the language of redevelopment has been understood by many communities that have fought to remain intact.  In San Francisco, those communities and their fights for survival are whispered anthems to community struggle; International Hotel, Yerba Buena, Fillmore.

Related stories:

A Blueprint for Greener Buildings


"Green building" movement to construct offices and homes that use less energy, less water, and more environmentally-friendly materials

 Ask a group of friends to name top sources of energy waste and pollution, and odds are good that no one would answer "my house" or "the place where I work." Yet the fact is that the nation's 5 million commercial facilities and 76 million residential buildings consume more than two-fifths of all our energy. They also account for just over one-third of the nation's carbon dioxide emissions (a chief culprit in climate change), about one-half of sulfur dioxide emissions, one-quarter of nitrous oxide emissions, and one-tenth of particulate emissions (all major contributors to smog and acid rain). The current construction boom is expected to add 38 million new buildings by the end of the decade, compounding the nation's air, waste, and water quality problems. Construction and demolition already generates 136 million tons of waste annually.

Related stories: